September 9, 2019
It’s only been six weeks since Boris Johnson became British Prime Minister, but the dramatic scenes produced by this "showman" Prime Minister can exceed the sum of British politics in the past six years.
British Prime Minister Boris Johnson has just experienced a "dark week", and suffered three consecutive defeats in Parliament-losing control of the parliamentary agenda, being blocked in pushing for a no-agreement Brexit, and being rejected in calling for an early election.
Recently, another extremely dramatic debate (tearing) theory (forcing)! Being beaten in a big mess, Boris exploded on the spot.
British Prime Minister Boris was besieged on all sides, and was ridiculed by the encirclement and suppression group-by Corbin, by Scottish MPs, by rebel men, and by the applause of the whole audience.
Not to be outdone, Boris invented all kinds of swearing words, such as "cowardly bitch" and "crazy old man" …
Let’s watch the scene of shelling and quarreling together immediately!
Wonderful audio:
The Prime Minister’s question was rejected, and Boris broke the news on the spot from Wechat Lohas UK 00:0014:31.
Full text in Chinese and English
Mr Speaker:Jeremy Corbyn!
Speaker: Corbin!
Jeremy Corbyn:Mr Speaker, I really fail to see how I can be accused of undermining negotiations because no negotiations are taking place!
Corbin: Your Excellency, I really don’t understand how anyone can accuse me of sabotaging the Brexit negotiations. Because the Brexit negotiations don’t exist!
He has been Prime Minister for six weeks and he promised to get Brexit sorted. In six weeks，he has presented nothing to change the previous Prime Minister’s deal, which he twice voted against.
The prime minister came to power for six weeks, and he promised to solve the Brexit problem. During these six weeks, he did not provide any plan to change the former prime minister’s Brexit agreement. He once voted against the agreement twice.
These negotiations that he talks about are a sham. All he’s doing is running down the clock. At the weekend, the Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster said that food prices would go up under no deal.
What he said about the Brexit negotiations was all an illusion. The only thing he did was to wait for the Brexit deadline to come. Last weekend, the Minister of Duchy Affairs of Lancaster said that leaving the EU without agreement would lead to higher food prices.
Will the Prime Minister publish the Yellowhammer documents?
Can the Prime Minister make public the document "Operation Yellow Flounder"?
Note: "Operation Yellowhammer": A forecast document on Brexit made by the British Cabinet Office. According to the contents of the document, if Britain leaves the EU without agreement, it may face a series of dilemmas such as food, fuel and medicine shortages.
So that people can see which food prices will go up and by how much?
Let people see which food prices will go up. How big is the increase?
Mr Speaker:Prime Minister!
Speaker: Prime Minister!
Boris Johnson:The Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster said absolutely no such thing and I can tell him that preparations for no deal, thanks to his good offices and thanks to his efforts, are very far advanced.
Boris Johnson: The Minister of Duchy Affairs of Lancaster never said that! I want to tell him that with the help and efforts of this minister, our preparations for leaving the EU without agreement are progressing very smoothly.
I tell him that the surest way of getting no deal is to undermine this country’s ability to negotiate which is what he is doing.
What is most likely to lead to a no-agreement Brexit is to weaken our country’s negotiating strength. This is what he is doing!
And I have to say, Mr Speaker that if this Bill is passed this afternoon. I don’t want an election, and I don’t think he wants an election, but there is a petition on his own Labour website with 57,000 people, including Carol, Nigel, Graham and Phoebe calling for an election.
Mr. Speaker, I must say that if this bill is passed this afternoon … I don’t want an election, and I know he doesn’t want an election either, but official website, the Labour Party, has launched a petition, including 57,000 people including Carol, Nigel, Graeme and Phoebe, calling for an early election.
I do not know whether there is a Jeremy on the list. But Mr Speaker, I know that he is worried about free trade deals with America but there’s only one chlorinated chicken that I can see in the House and he is on that Bench! !
I wonder if "Jeremy" is on the petition list! I know he is skeptical about signing a free trade agreement with the United States, but there is only one "chlorinated chicken" in our house of commons. He’s in the opposite seat!
Will he confirm that he will let the people decide on what he is doing to this country’s negotiating position by having a general election on 15 October?
Can he confirm that he will give the decision to the people and let them vote to choose whether to support his negotiating position and hold a general election on October 15th?
Mr Speaker:Jeremy Corbyn!
Speaker: Corbin!
Jeremy Corbyn:Mr Speaker, you don’t have to go very far from the portals of this House to see real destitution: people begging and sleeping on the streets; child poverty is up compared with 2010; pensioner poverty is up; in-work poverty is up.
Corbin: Your Excellency! Not far from the parliament building, you can see what real extreme poverty is: people sleep on the streets and beg for a living; Compared with 2010, child poverty has intensified; Retirement poverty has intensified, and on-the-job poverty has intensified.
And he won’t give us any of the information of the assessments of increased poverty that could come from his Government’s proposals. We are less than 60 days away from leaving the EU with no deal.
The Prime Minister still refuses to disclose any information about the government’s assessment report on the problem of increasing poverty. There are less than 60 days left before there is no agreement to leave the EU.
The Prime Minister has had two days in office before the summer recess and then planned to prorogue Parliament.
Before the summer recess of parliament, the prime minister suddenly decided to force a recess after only two days in power.
Yesterday, he lost one vote—his first vote in Parliament and he now wants to dissolve Parliament. He is desperate—absolutely desperate—to avoid scrutiny.
Yesterday, he was defeated in the voting, which was his first time to vote since he took office. Now, he is trying to dissolve parliament. He really tried his best to escape the supervision of the House of Commons!
Hon. Members: Well, call an election! You great big girl’s blouse!
Other members: general election if you have the ability! You cowardly bitch!
And in his third day in office, after five questions from me. We have not had an answer to any of them, I can see why he is desperate to avoid scrutiny: he has no plan to get a new deal, no plan, no authority and no majority.
On his third day in office, I asked him five questions. I haven’t heard his answer until now! I understand why he is so eager to escape the censorship. He has no plan to reach a new agreement at all, no plan, no authorization and no half support.
If he… Mr Speaker.
If he … Mr. Speaker!
Mr Speaker:Ooorder! If we have to go on longer, because people sitting on the Treasury Bench are yelling to try to disrupt, so be it, we will go on longer.
Speaker: Silence! It seems that the agenda will be overtime. Because the one sitting in the finance seat has been clamoring for trouble. Whatever, as long as you like.
Some people used to believe in good behaviour; I believe in good behaviour on both sides of the House. It had better happen or it will take a whole lot longer, very simple, very clear. Jeremy Corbyn!
Some lawmakers used to pay attention to words and deeds. I believe both camps can perform well. You’d better do it, otherwise it will drag on for a long time. Very simple, very clear. Corbin!
Jeremy Corbyn:Thank you, Mr Speaker. If the Prime Minister does to the country, what he’s done to his party in the past 24 hours.
Corbin: Thank you, Mr. Speaker. If the Prime Minister treats Britain as a whole, as he has done to the Conservative Party in the past 24 hours, then countless British people will be terrified.
I think a lot of people have a great deal to fear, from his incompetence, his vacillation, and his refusal to publish known facts that are known to him, about the effects of a no-deal Brexit.
He is weak and indecisive. He is very aware of the consequences of leaving the EU without agreement, but he refuses to make it public.
Note: Boris kicked 21 naysayers out of the Conservative Party.
Boris Johnson:I really don’t see how with a straight face the right hon. Gentleman can accuse anybody of being unwilling to stand up to scrutiny when h e will not agree to submit his surrender Bill to the verdict of the people in an election.
Boris Johnson: I really don’t get it. This gentleman has a bad face. Blame others brazenly and refuse to be censored. Obviously, it is he who is unwilling to hand over his "surrender bill" to the people and vote in the general election.
He is frit; he is frightened. And he makes a contrast between this Government and his own proposals.
He is a coward and a coward. He made a contrast between our government and his own proposal, and the contrast between us is really obvious: in my eyes, Britain’s allies and partners.
The contrast could not be clearer: we think that the friends of this country are to be found in Paris, in Berlin and in the White House and he thinks that they are in the Kremlin, and in Tehran and …
In Paris, in Berlin, in the White House. But in his view, British allies are in the Kremlin, Tehran. …
He does. And in Caracas and I think he is “caracas”!
And the capital of Venezuela-Caracas! He is a "crazy old man"!
Note: "caracas" is homophonic with "crackers".
Mr Speaker, we are putting 20,000 police on the street, we have 20 new hospital upgrades, we are growing the economy. He, by contrast, would put a 300 billion tax on every company in the country.
We sent 20,000 extra policemen to strengthen street patrol. We upgraded 20 hospitals completely, and we vigorously revitalized the economy. But he intends to impose a tax of up to 300 billion on all British companies.
He wants a tax on homes, and he is calling incessantly for a general strike. The shadow Education Secretary says that their economic policy is, and I quote, Mr Speaker by your leave "shit-or-bust".
He wants to tax housing, and he keeps calling for a general strike. The Shadow Education Labor Party said so, and I quote, please forgive my words, their labor party’s economic policy … "It’s either a piece of shit or a mess."
I say it’s both, Mr Speaker! What this country needs is sensible, moderate, progressive Conservative government and to take this country out of the EU on 31 October and that is what we are going to deliver.
I’d say both are right! What our country needs is a wise, moderate and progressive Conservative government, and on October 31st, it will lead Britain to leave the European Union. This is our goal.
Mr Speaker:Order! Order!
Speaker: Silence! Silence!
Hon. Members: More!
Other Members: Speak more!
Mr Speaker:Will indeed be more. Douglas Chapman (SNP)!
Speaker: There will be more questions. Douglas Chapman (Scottish National Party).
Douglas Chapman (SNP):Mr Speaker, you know that I am not a doomster or a gloomster. On that positive note， I’d like thank the Prime Minister for boosting support for Scottish independence just a few weeks into his premiership they may be his last few weeks …
Douglas Chapman (Scottish National Party): You know, your Excellency, I am not a pessimist. On the positive side, I want to thank the Prime Minister. In just a few weeks after he took office, the Scottish people’s support for independence has greatly increased! This is probably the last few weeks of his administration.
Prime Minister, according to research by the UK Trade Policy Observatory a no-deal Brexit would cost up to 1,100 jobs in my constituency and over 63,000 jobs across Scotland.
According to the research of the British Trade Policy Observation Mission, leaving the EU without agreement will cause 1,100 people in my constituency to lose their jobs, and 63,000 people in Scotland will lose their jobs.
Will the Prime Minister explain to me and my constituents who are facing that dreadful prospect, what their families should do in terms of the heavy price that they are paying, for a Brexit that they never voted for?
Can the Prime Minister explain to me and my constituents that their jobs are in jeopardy, and what should they do in the face of rising prices? They never even voted for Brexit!
Boris Johnson:Of course we are preparing for a no-deal Brexit if we absolutely must I don’t think the consequences will be anything like as bad as the merchants of Project Fear have said, but the way to avoid a no-deal Brexit is to allow this Government to get on and do a deal at the summit on 17 October.
Boris Johnson: Of course, we are preparing for leaving the EU without agreement, which is necessary. But I don’t think the consequences of no agreement will be as sensational as the supporters of the "intimidation plan" say. But we have a chance to avoid leaving the EU without agreement, as long as our government reaches an agreement at the EU summit on October 17th.
The choice for this country is who they want doing that deal: this Government or that Labour party, led by Jeremy Corbyn.
The choice facing the British people is who they want to reach an agreement, our government or the Labour Party led by jeremy corbyn?
Mr Speaker:We don’t name people in the Chamber. People must observe the rules… I am simply and politely informing the Prime Minister of the very long -established procedure with which everybody, including the Prime Minister, must comply.
Your Excellency the Speaker: During the debate in the House of Commons, you are not allowed to call others names. You must obey the rules … Silence! Silence! I just politely reminded the Prime Minister that the long-standing rules and regulations of the House of Commons, including the Prime Minister, must be strictly observed.
That’s the position no doubt, no argument, no contradiction—end of the matter. Vernon Coaker (Lab)!
This is my position. No doubt, no dispute, no refutation, that’s all. Vernon cocker (Labour)!
Vernon Coaker (Lab):Thank you, Mr Speaker, the Prime Minister yesterday booted 21 MPs from his own party for voting against a reckless no-deal Brexit. These included well-respected Members of t his House including a former Chancellor, including Churchill’s grandson and the Father of the House.
Vernon cocker (Labour Party): Thank you, Mr Speaker. Yesterday, the Prime Minister expelled 21 Conservatives from the party because they voted against leaving the EU without agreement. These include many respected MPs, such as the former finance minister, Churchill’s grandson and the father of the House of Commons.
Presumably, on the orders of the Prime Minister’s chief of staff. Given the fact that the Prime Minister himself voted against the former Prime.
It is estimated that it was ordered by the chief of staff of Downing Street. In view of the fact that the Prime Minister voted against the former Prime Minister’s Brexit agreement several times.
Minister’s deal without losing the Whip does this not show and demonstrate to the British public his view of life namely, that there is one rule for him and another for everyone else?
After he took office, he kept the original party whip. Isn’t this showing the British people his attitude towards life: one set of standards for himself is another set of standards for others? !
Mr Speaker:Prime Minister!
Speaker: Please welcome the Prime Minister!
Boris Johnson:Mr Speaker!
Boris Johnson: Your Excellency!
Mr Speaker, I’m not going to take any lessons from the Labour party
Mr. Speaker, I don’t want to be lectured by Labour. …
Mr Speaker:Order… order! ! Leave me to control the proceedings; I should be immensely grateful for your assistance in that regard. That heckling must cease, and we will hear the reply. The Prime Minister!
Speaker: Silence … Silence! Let me control the agenda. Thank you very much for your reminding and help. Noisy heckling must be stopped at once. Must listen to the answer, please welcome the Prime Minister!
Boris Johnson:Mr Speaker, I’m not going to take any lectures from anybody in the Labour party about how to run a party. Look, this is a party where good, hard-working MPs are daily hounded out by antisemitic mobs.
Boris Johnson: Your Excellency, I don’t want to be taught by their Labour Party how to lead a political party! In their party, hardworking and excellent Labour Party members are expelled from the party by anti-Semitic thugs every day.
Let’s be absolutely clear: if the hon. Gentleman is actually interested in democracy then I hope he has been listening to what I have been saying today.
Let’s be clear: if you sincerely respect democracy. Then I hope that he has listened to my speech today.
In an anti-democratic way, the Bill before the House today would hand over this country’s right to decide how long to remain in the EU and it would hand it over to the EU itself. That‘s what the Bill involves.
Today’s bill deprives us of our right to decide for ourselves how long to stay in Europe in an anti-democratic way. And hand over the decision to the EU. This is the meaning of the bill.
If he thinks that is a good idea, then let him submit it to the judgment of the British people in an election
If he really thinks the bill is desirable, then he should agree to the general election and let the bill be tested by the people’s votes.
Mr Speaker:Mr Singh Dhesi (Lab)!
Speaker: Singh Daisy (Labour Party)!
Mr Singh Dhesi (Lab):Thank you very much, Mr Speaker. If I decide to wear a turban, or you decide to wear a cross, or he decides to wear a kippah or skull cap, or she decides to wear a hijab or a burqa, does that mean that it is open season for right hon. Members of this House to make derogatory and divisive remarks about our appearance?
Singh Daisy (Labour Party): Thank you, Mr Speaker. I choose to wear a headscarf, you choose to wear a cross, he chooses to wear a Jewish round hat, and she chooses to wear a headscarf and a burqa. Does this mean that the House of Commons has started the stage of free attack? Can freely make derogatory and divisive remarks against the appearance of others?
For those of us who, from a young age have had to endure and face up to being called names such as towelhead or Taliban or coming from bongo, bongo land, we can appreciate full well the hurt and pain felt by already vulnerable Muslim women when they are described as looking like bank robbers and letterboxes!
For those of us who have had to endure and face all kinds of ridicule and nicknames since childhood, such as "towel head", "Taliban" and "African indigenous people from Bongo". Therefore, we fully understand the hurt and pain that Muslim women, as a vulnerable group, suffer when they are described by the Prime Minister as "bank robbers" and "walking mailboxes".
So rather than hide behind sham and whitewash investigations when will the Prime Minister finally apologise for his derogatory and racist remarks?
Instead of hiding behind a false and whitewashed investigation, when will the Prime Minister apologize for his racist remarks?
Go on! Well done! Come on! Go on, chap!
Well said! Excellent! Great, man!
Racist remarks, Mr Speaker, which have led to a spike in hate crime. And given the increasing prevalence of such incidents within his party when will the Prime Minister finally o rder, an inquiry into Islamophobia within the Conservative party, something that he and his Chancellor promised on national television? !
It is these racist remarks that have led to a surge in hate crimes. In view of this kind of incident, it is becoming more and more common in his party. When will the Prime Minister finally order an investigation into Islamophobia in their Conservative Party? This is a public promise made by him and his finance minister on TV and facing the whole country!
Mr Speaker:! Let’s hear the answer – the Prime Minister!
Speaker: Silence! Silence! Listen to the Prime Minister’s answer together.
Boris Johnson:Mr Speaker, if the …
Boris Johnson: Your Excellency.
Mr Speaker:Order… ! ! The response from the Prime Minister will be heard. The Prime Minister!
Speaker: Silence … Silence! Silence! Silence! Must listen to the Prime Minister’s answer, please welcome the Prime Minister!
Boris Johnson:Thank you, Mr Speaker! Can I just say to the hon. Gentleman that if he took the trouble to read the article in question, he would see that it was a strong liberal defence…as he began his question by saying everybody’s right to wear whatever they want in this country.
Boris Johnson: Thank you, Mr Speaker! I want to tell your Excellency that if he takes the time to read my article carefully, he will find that I am making a strong defense of liberalism … As he said at the beginning of the question, everyone in our country has the freedom to dress.
And I speak as somebody who is proud not only to have Muslim ancestors, but to be related to Sikhs such as himself.
I am not only proud of myself, but also of having Muslim ancestors. Like him, I am proud of my Sikh ancestry.
I am also proud, Mr Speaker, to say that under this Government, we have the most diverse Cabinet in the history of this country. And we truly reflect modern Britain.
I am also proud to say that under the leadership of this government, we have formed the most diverse cabinet in British history. We truly reflect modern Britain.
And Mr Speaker, we have yet to hear from anywhere in the Labour party is any hint of apology for the virus of antisemitism that is now rampant in their ranks and I wo uld like to hear that from the hon. Gentleman opposites.
Mr Speaker, so far we have not heard any apology from the Labour Party for the prevalence of anti-Semitism. This kind of "anti-Semitic virus" is rampant in its ranks. I’d like to hear your reply.
Mr Speaker:Margot James (Ind)!
Speaker: Margo James (the former Conservative Party was expelled from the Party by Boris).
Margot James (Ind):Thank you, Mr Speaker. The great lady, whom you and I both revere I’m sure, Mr Speaker once said, "Advisers advise, Ministers decide".
Margot James (the former Conservative Party was expelled from Boris): Thank you, Mr. Speaker. The great lady (Mrs. Thatcher) whom you and I have great respect for. She once said, "Advisors make suggestions and ministers make decisions."
Can I ask the Prime Minister to bear that statement closely in mind in relation to his own chief adviser, Dominic Cummings?
May I ask the Prime Minister to keep in mind the statement concerning Dominic Cummings, his chief adviser?
Note: Cummings, the behind-the-scenes strategist of the Brexit camp, is the brain behind Boris’s Brexit plan. This is an irony that Boris allowed Cummings to make a decision.
Boris Johnson:Well, Mr Speaker.
Boris Johnson: Your Excellency.
Mr Speaker:Oorder… oorder, order! ! ! ORDERRRR! The reply must be heard. If the House were to want as a matter of course to allow clapping by decision of the House, so be it, but it should not otherwise become a regular practice.
Speaker: Su … Quiet! Silence! Silence! Su! Quiet! You must listen to the answer. If the members of the House of Representatives unanimously agree to spontaneous applause, then you can continue. But applause should never be the norm.
But we’ve heard the question, pungently expressed. Let’s hear the answer from the Prime Minister.
We have listened to the questions that hit the nail on the head, and then we must listen to the Prime Minister’s answer.
Boris Johnson:Mr Speaker, I am used to breasting applause from Labour audiences, particularly since, unlike the Gentleman opposite.
Speaker: Speaker, I have long been used to hearing a flood of applause from the Labour Party! Different from your Excellency across the street.
We are actually devoted to delivering on the mandate of those Labour constituencies and we are going to take the UK out of the EU on 31 October.
Because I have been committed to fulfilling the mission entrusted by Labour voters. That is to lead Britain to leave the European Union on October 31st.
And as for the excellent question that my hon. Friend asked be in no doubt that we are deciding on a policy to take this country forward, not backwards, as he would do!
As for this excellent question raised by our respected friend. There is no doubt that we are making decisions to push the country forward. Unlike him, it will only make the country go backwards!
(Source: UK Parliament)
Please poke the video: WeChat WeChat official account Lohas England
End
The picture comes from the Internet.
◆
I knew you were watching.
Don’t forget to stamp "Watching" before you go.
Wechat sweep