one
(2019) The case of Wang Chang Medicine (No.2999) suspected of intentional injury at the beginning of 0606 in Guangdong.
Two
(2019) Guangdong 0606 Early Republic of China No.20720 Shunde Branch of China Agricultural Bank Co., Ltd. and Guo Shanfeng’s credit card dispute.
three
(2019) Guangdong 0606 Early Republic of China No.20721 Shunde Branch of Agricultural Bank of China and Su Weichang’s credit card dispute.
four
(2019) Huang Jie’s case of suspected dangerous driving, No.3025, the first sentence of Guangdong 0606.
five
(2019) The case of Mo Shanzheng suspected of dangerous driving, No.3028, the first sentence of Guangdong 0606.
six
(2019) Guangdong 0606 Republic of China No.21043 and No.21044 Foshan Shunde Yatuo Hardware Furniture Co., Ltd. v. Wang Guozheng and Xie Yiqiang.
seven
(2019) Guangdong 0606 Early Republic of China No.12597 Foshan Shunde Brother Deli Feed Industry Co., Ltd. v. Wen Bai (case of a dispute over a sales contract).
eight
(2019) Guangdong 0606 No.13549, Early Republic of China (case of processing contract dispute between Jinyang Hua Tin Printing Can Co., Ltd. and Liang Jukeng, Shunde District, Foshan City)
nine
(2019) Guangdong 0606 Minchu No.14689 Foshan Shunde Jinfeng Feed Factory Co., Ltd. v. Huang Zhijie (case of dispute over sales contract).
Ten
(2019) Guangdong 0606 Early Republic of China No.11848 He Yongquan and Chen Anyi’s private lending dispute.
Eleven
(2019) Guangdong 0606 Republic of China No.11110 Liu Guangjie and Wang Weimao’s equity transfer dispute.
Brief introduction of live broadcast case 1
Case number: (2019) Yue 0606 Criminal Chu No.2999.
Cause of action: intentional injury
Prosecutor: Li Baicheng
Defendant: Wang Chang Medicine.
Time and place of trial: 9: 00 on November 5, 2019, the fourth trial court.
Presiding Judge: Lin Xiaochun
Clerk: Gao Yukun
Brief introduction of the case: On the evening of July 15th, 2019, the defendant, the victims Zhang Moumou and Zhang met for a drink in Guanghua Village, Xingtan Town, Shunde District, Foshan City. During this period, the defendant had an argument with Zhang and others. Later, when the defendant tried to chase Zhang and others with a beer bottle, he was dissuaded by Zhang Moumou. When the two were entangled, the defendant fell to the ground and broke the beer bottle in his hand. The defendant stabbed Zhang Moumou with a broken beer bottle, stabbing Zhang Moumou in the neck (minor injuries were identified as Grade II).
After the incident, the defendant’s family compensated the victim Zhang Moumou for RMB 9,000, and obtained the victim’s understanding.
Scan the QR code below
Enter to watch the live broadcast of the trial.
▼▼
Brief introduction of live broadcast case II
Case number: (2019) Yue 0606 Minchu No.20720
Cause of action: credit card dispute
Plaintiff: Shunde Branch of China Agricultural Bank Co., Ltd.
Defendant: Guo Shanfeng
Time and place of trial: at 9: 00 on November 5, 2019, the fourth trial court of Beijiao Court.
Presiding Judge: Wu Simeng
Clerk: He Zhuojun
Brief introduction of the case: On September 13th, 2013, the defendant submitted the application form of Jinsui Credit Card of Agricultural Bank of China to the plaintiff for applying for a credit card, confirming that he was willing to abide by the rules of the application form. Subsequently, the plaintiff issued a credit card (card number: 6259960031289671) to the defendant after examination, and the defendant used the card for overdraft consumption. As of April 7, 2019, the amount owed by the defendant and various charging standards are as follows:
No. Item Amount (Yuan) Charge Standard
1 principal 10528.65/
2 Interest 1323.47 Article 4.4 of the contract: The upper limit of overdraft interest rate is five ten thousandths of the daily interest rate, with compound interest on a monthly basis, and simple interest on specific products.
3 liquidated damages for overdue repayment 607.31 was announced in official website, Agricultural Bank of China on September 29, 2016, and the overdue payment item was adjusted as liquidated damages from January 1, 2017. The webpage address is http://www.abchina.com/cn/personal services/SVC bulletin/201609/t20160929 _ 930274.htm, with the minimum repayment amount.
4. Consumption installment fee 0. Announcement of Agricultural Bank of China in official website, the webpage address is: http://www.abchina.com/cn/creditcard/xykts/201812/t20181227 _ 1805701.htm, and the maximum installment fee does not exceed the installment amount * the number of installments *1.2%, and the installment fee in this case does not exceed six thousandths of the application amount.
5 Cash installment fee 0 Announcement of Agricultural Bank of China in official website, website address: http://www.abchina.com/cn/creditcard/xykts/201812/t20181227 _ 1805701.htm, with the maximum installment amount * number of installments *1.2%, and the installment fee in this case does not exceed six thousandths of the applied amount.
6. The installment fee of the bill is announced by the Agricultural Bank of China in official website. The webpage address is http://www.abchina.com/cn/creditcard/xykts/201812/t20181227 _ 1805701.htm, and the maximum installment fee shall not exceed the installment amount * the number of installments *1.2%. The installment fee in this case shall not exceed six thousandths of the application amount.
The above facts are proved by evidence such as credit card application documents, contract and transaction details. The defendant’s overdue repayment has constituted a breach of contract, which has seriously damaged the plaintiff’s interests. According to the agreement of relevant credit card documents, the plaintiff has the right to ask the defendant to repay the principal in arrears and the interest, late fees and related expenses up to the actual settlement date immediately. Request the court to find out the facts, make a judgment as requested, and safeguard the legitimate rights and interests of the plaintiff.
Claim: 1. The defendant repaid the principal of the credit card of RMB 10,528.65 and the interest and expenses up to the actual repayment date (temporarily calculated as RMB 1,323.47 in arrears on April 7, 2019, RMB 607.31 as penalty for overdue repayment, and 0 yuan as handling fee, and thereafter the interest will be calculated at the daily interest rate of 0.5 ‰, and the penalty for overdue repayment will be calculated as 5% of the unpaid part of the minimum repayment until the repayment date), and the above sum will be temporarily 10. 2. The defendant shall bear the legal costs of this case.
Scan the QR code below
Enter to watch the live broadcast of the trial.
▼▼
Brief introduction of live broadcast case 3
Case number: (2019) Yue 0606 Minchu No.20721
Cause of action: credit card dispute
Plaintiff: Shunde Branch of China Agricultural Bank Co., Ltd.
Defendant: Su Weichang
Time and place of trial: at 9: 10 on November 5, 2019, the fourth trial court of Beijiao Court.
Presiding Judge: Wu Simeng
Clerk: He Zhuojun
Brief introduction of the case: On May 26th, 2011, the defendant submitted the application form of Jinsui Credit Card of Agricultural Bank of China to the plaintiff for applying for a credit card, and confirmed that he was willing to abide by the rules of the application form and the contract. Subsequently, the plaintiff issued a credit card (card number: 4637580003142274) to the defendant after examination, and the defendant used the card for overdraft consumption. As of April 17, 2019, the amount owed by the defendant and various charging standards are as follows:
No. Item Amount (Yuan) Charge Standard
1 principal 18147.73/
2 Interest 834.30 Article 4.4 of the contract: The upper limit of overdraft interest rate is five ten thousandths of the daily interest rate, with compound interest on a monthly basis, and simple interest on specific products.
3 liquidated damages for overdue repayment 491.73 was announced in official website, Agricultural Bank of China on September 29, 2016, and the overdue payment item was adjusted as liquidated damages from January 1, 2017. The webpage address is http://www.abchina.com/cn/personal services/SVC bulletin/201609/t20160929 _ 930274.htm, with the minimum repayment amount.
4. Consumption installment fee 0. Announcement of Agricultural Bank of China in official website, the webpage address is: http://www.abchina.com/cn/creditcard/xykts/201812/t20181227 _ 1805701.htm, and the maximum installment fee does not exceed the installment amount * the number of installments *1.2%, and the installment fee in this case does not exceed six thousandths of the application amount.
5 Cash installment fee 0 Announcement of Agricultural Bank of China in official website, website address: http://www.abchina.com/cn/creditcard/xykts/201812/t20181227 _ 1805701.htm, with the maximum installment amount * number of installments *1.2%, and the installment fee in this case does not exceed six thousandths of the applied amount.
6. The installment fee of the bill is announced by the Agricultural Bank of China in official website. The webpage address is http://www.abchina.com/cn/creditcard/xykts/201812/t20181227 _ 1805701.htm, and the maximum installment fee shall not exceed the installment amount * the number of installments *1.2%. The installment fee in this case shall not exceed six thousandths of the application amount.
The above facts are proved by evidence such as credit card application documents, contract and transaction details. The defendant’s overdue repayment has constituted a breach of contract, which has seriously damaged the plaintiff’s interests. According to the agreement of relevant credit card documents, the plaintiff has the right to ask the defendant to repay the principal in arrears and the interest, late fees and related expenses up to the actual settlement date immediately. Request the court to find out the facts, make a judgment as requested, and safeguard the legitimate rights and interests of the plaintiff.
Claim: 1. The defendant repaid the principal of the credit card of RMB 18,147.73 and the interest and expenses up to the date of actual repayment (temporarily calculated as 834.30 yuan of interest owed on April 17, 2019, 491.73 yuan of overdue repayment penalty and 0 yuan, and thereafter the interest is calculated at the daily interest rate of 0.5 ‰, and the overdue repayment penalty is calculated as 5% of the unpaid part of the minimum repayment amount until the date of repayment), and the above sum is temporarily calculated as 11. 2. The defendant shall bear the legal costs of this case.
Scan the QR code below
Enter to watch the live broadcast of the trial.
▼▼
Brief introduction of live broadcast case 4
CaseNo.: (2019) Yue 0606 Criminal Chu No.3025
Cause of action: sales contract dispute
Prosecutor: Li Baicheng
Defendant: Huang Jie.
Time and place of trial: November 5, 2019 at 9: 15, the fourth trial court.
Presiding Judge: Lin Xiaochun
Clerk: Gao Yukun
Brief introduction: At about 6: 13 on April 14th, 2019, the defendant drunk and drove a small car of Guangdong S to the traffic light of Lunjiao Street Office, Nanyuan Road, Lunjiao Town, Shunde District, Foshan City, Guangdong Province. Due to improper control, it collided with the roadside flower base, resulting in a road traffic accident in which the vehicle and flower base were damaged. After identification, ethanol was detected in the defendant’s blood, with a content of 90.5mg/100ml.
Scan the QR code below
Enter to watch the live broadcast of the trial.
▼▼
Brief introduction of live broadcast case 5
CaseNo.: (2019) Yue 0606 Criminal Chu No.3028
Cause of action: crime of dangerous driving
Prosecutor: Li Baicheng
Defendant: Mo Shanzheng
Time and place of trial: November 5, 2019 at 9: 25, the fourth trial court.
Presiding Judge: Lin Xiaochun
Clerk: Gao Yukun
Brief introduction: At about 23: 58 on September 11, 2019, the defendant was caught by the police on duty while driving an ordinary two-wheeled motorcycle with expensive F to the intersection of Lungui Road, Hongqi Road, Ronggui Street, Shunde District, Foshan City. After identification, ethanol was detected in the defendant’s blood, with a content of 150.2mg/100ml.
Scan the QR code below
Enter to watch the live broadcast of the trial.
▼▼
Brief introduction of live broadcast case 6
Case number: (2019) Yue 0606 Minchu 21043 and 21044.
Cause of action: labor contract dispute
Plaintiff: Foshan Shunde Yatuo Hardware Furniture Co., Ltd.
Defendants: Wang Guozheng (Defendant I) and Xie Yiqiang (Defendant II)
Time and place of trial: November 5, 2019 at 14: 30, the 18th court.
Presiding Judge: Huang Zhiping
Clerk: Liang Shujun
Brief introduction of the case: Defendants I and II applied for arbitration for double wages because "the company forced me to leave the factory", not because the two parties did not sign a labor contract. Although the two defendants did not sign a labor contract with the plaintiff during their employment, they filled in the "Employee Entry Registration Form" when they joined the company. This form contains the basic elements of a labor contract and should be regarded as a labor contract signed by both parties, so the plaintiff does not need to pay the two defendants double the wage difference for the unsigned labor contract.
Claim: Plaintiff doesn’t need to pay Defendant I the double wage difference of 23,663.21 yuan without signing a labor contract, and Defendant II the double wage difference of 28,850.93 yuan without signing a labor contract.
Scan the QR code below
Enter to watch the live broadcast of the trial.
▼▼
Brief introduction of live broadcast case 7
Case number: (2019) Yue 0606 Minchu No.12597
Cause of action: sales contract dispute
Plaintiff: Foshan Shunde Brother Deli Feed Industry Co., Ltd.
Defendant: Wen Qikai.
Time and place of trial: at 9: 30 on November 6, 2019, the first trial court of Xingtan Court.
Presiding Judge: Ouyang Yongben
Clerk: Huang Anqi.
Brief introduction of the case: It was originally told that the plaintiff and the defendant signed a Distribution Contract on December 26th, 2016, stipulating that the defendant would distribute all the series of feed of the plaintiff in Longkou Town, Heshan City. The contract was valid from December 26th, 2016 to December 25th, 2017, and it was stipulated that if the contract expires or the business is terminated due to other reasons, if the defendant fails to pay the payment in time, it will have to pay double interest to the plaintiff. On May 5, 2018, the original defendant confirmed that by August 25, 2017, the defendant owed the plaintiff a total of 274,075.9 yuan in payment and 5,481.52 yuan in interest.
Claims: 1. The defendant paid the plaintiff 274,075.9 yuan; 2. The defendant paid the plaintiff interest of 5481.52 yuan.
Scan the QR code below
Enter to watch the live broadcast of the trial.
▼▼
Brief introduction of live broadcast case 8
Case number: (2019) Yue 0606 Minchu No.13549
Cause of action: processing contract dispute
Plaintiff: Jinyang Hua Tin Printing Can Manufacturing Co., Ltd., Shunde District, Foshan City.
Defendant: Liang Jukeng.
Time and place of trial: November 6, 2019 at 10: 00, the first trial court of Xingtan Court.
Presiding Judge: Ouyang Yongben
Clerk: Huang Anqi.
Brief introduction of the case: It was originally told that the plaintiff processed stainless steel coil materials for the defendant from February 2017 to December 2018. On December 3, 2018, the defendant issued an "IOU" to the plaintiff, confirming that it owed the plaintiff a processing fee of 68,047.6 yuan. The defendant promised to pay it by the end of December 2018, but only paid 3,000 yuan on April 20, 2019, and did not continue to pay after that. The plaintiff believes that the defendant failed to pay the processing fee as agreed and needs to bear the corresponding liability for breach of contract, and hereby files a lawsuit.
Claim: 1. The defendant paid the plaintiff a processing fee of 65,047.6 yuan, and paid interest at the same loan interest rate of China People’s Bank from January 1, 2019 to the actual payment date; 2. The defendant paid the plaintiff a lawyer’s fee of 5,000 yuan.
Scan the QR code below
Enter to watch the live broadcast of the trial.
▼▼
Brief introduction of live broadcast case 9
CaseNo.: (2019) Yue 0606 Minchu No.14689
Cause of action: sales contract dispute
Plaintiff: Foshan Shunde Jinfeng Feed Factory Co., Ltd.
Defendant: Huang Zhijie.
Time and place of trial: at 9: 30 on November 7, 2019, the first trial court of Beijiao Court.
Members of the collegial panel: presiding judge He Ziliang, people’s assessor Du Jianbin and people’s assessor Pan Yixin.
Presiding Judge: He Ziliang
Clerk: Feng Xiaolan
Brief introduction of the case: The defendant used to be the feed distributor of the plaintiff, selling the feed produced by the plaintiff as an agent. After reconciliation with the plaintiff, as of February 1, 2001, the defendant confirmed that he still owed the plaintiff 878,553 yuan for feed, and pledged to pay off the arrears in time with the real estate license. Later, after the defendant paid only 10,000 yuan, he shut down the feed distribution shop and deliberately evaded the debt. After repeated urging by the plaintiff, the payment has not been paid.
Claim: 1. Order the defendant to pay the payment of 868,553 yuan and interest (the interest is calculated from the date of prosecution to the date of full payment according to the bank’s loan interest rate for the same period); 2. The legal costs of this case shall be borne by the defendant.
Scan the QR code below
Enter to watch the live broadcast of the trial.
▼▼
Brief introduction of live broadcast case 10
Case number: (2019) Yue 0606 Minchu No.11848
Cause of action: private lending dispute
Plaintiff: He Yongquan.
Defendant: Chen Youxi.
Time and place of trial: at 10: 00 on November 7, 2019, the fifth trial court of Lunjiao Court.
Presiding Judge: Xu Yan
Clerk: Liao Weicheng
Brief introduction of the case: On June 15, 2018, the original defendant and the defendant signed the Loan Contract, stipulating that the defendant needs to borrow 40,000 yuan from the plaintiff for capital turnover, and the loan period is one year. The defendant needs to pay 4,000 yuan of interest every month, and should pay all the principal to the plaintiff at one time after the expiration. If the defendant breaches the contract, the defendant shall pay the plaintiff the principal and interest in one lump sum, and also bear the legal fees and litigation preservation fees. The plaintiff paid the defendant the principal of 36,000 yuan on the same day, and the defendant only paid the plaintiff the interest of 4,000 yuan on July 18, 2018, and then did not pay it. After repeated unsuccessful collection, the plaintiff sued, and the defendant also had to bear the lawyer’s fee of 4,000 yuan for the plaintiff to entrust a lawyer to recover the arrears from the defendant.
Claim: 1. Order the defendant to repay the loan principal of 36,000 yuan and interest of 15,836.05 yuan to the plaintiff (the interest is based on 36,000 yuan, with an annual interest rate of 24%, from July 19, 2018 to the date of actual repayment, and temporarily calculated as 15,836.05 yuan on May 18, 2019); 2. The defendant was ordered to pay a lawyer’s fee of 3,000 yuan; 3. The defendant was ordered to bear the legal fees and preservation fees of this case.
Scan the QR code below
Enter to watch the live broadcast of the trial.
▼▼
Brief introduction of live broadcast case 11
Case number: (2019) Yue 0606 Minchu No.11110
Cause of action: dispute over equity transfer
Plaintiff: Liu Guangjie.
Defendant: Wang Weimao
Time and place of trial: 9: 00 on November 11, 2019, the 18th court.
Presiding Judge: Ouyang Yuqiong
Clerk: Feng Junxiong
Brief introduction of the case: The plaintiff and the defendant signed the Equity Transfer Contract, stipulating that the defendant would transfer the equity he held to the plaintiff at a price of 600,000 yuan. After the contract was signed, the plaintiff paid the defendant 600,000 yuan for the equity transfer, and the defendant issued a receipt to confirm that all the equity transfer funds had been collected, but the defendant never assisted the plaintiff in the equity transfer procedures. Originally told to the people’s court to ask the defendant to assist in the transfer, but the equity involved in the case has been sealed up by the people’s court because of the debts owed by the defendant. To this end, the plaintiff filed an execution objection on December 11, 2017, which was rejected by the people’s court. In April 2018, the plaintiff filed a lawsuit against the outsider for execution of the objection. The people’s court ruled that the Equity Transfer Contract was legal and valid, and confirmed that the equity had been legally transferred to the plaintiff and could not be executed. The parties to the case appealed, and on March 8, 2019, the Intermediate People’s Court made a judgment, revoking the first-instance judgment and holding that the equity transfer between the plaintiff and the defendant was invalid. The plaintiff did not accept the defendant’s equity, but did not deny the effectiveness of the Equity Transfer Contract. The plaintiff believes that the Equity Transfer Contract is legal and valid, and the plaintiff has fulfilled the contractual obligations to pay the equity transfer fee, while the defendant failed to deliver the equity to the plaintiff effectively as agreed and was seized and executed by the people’s court, which in fact has been unable to be fulfilled, and the defendant has constituted a breach of contract and should bear the liability for breach of contract. To this end, the plaintiff filed a lawsuit.
Claims: 1. The Equity Transfer Contract signed by both parties on April 26, 2015 is dissolved by judgment; 2. The defendant was sentenced to return the equity transfer amount of 300,000 yuan to the plaintiff; 3. The defendant was sentenced to pay the plaintiff a penalty of 180,000 yuan; 4. The defendant was sentenced to pay the plaintiff an attorney fee of 8,000 yuan. 5. The defendant was sentenced to bear all the legal costs of this case.
Scan the QR code below
Enter to watch the live broadcast of the trial.
▼▼
Original title: "Theft, dangerous driving, intentional injury … This week’s live trial invites you to pay attention! 》